Whoever wrote this New York Times op-ed
is a committed Republican. He supported Trump in 2016, and he will
support Trump in 2020 if he is re-nominated. He would rather have an
incompetent Republican as President than a competent Democrat. This
is why he continues to work under Trump.
If Trump is incompetent, and his
administration knows this, one might wonder why the Vice President
and the Cabinet don't remove him from office using the 25th
Amendment. The op-ed author wrote:
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.
This is a poor excuse. The 25th
Amendment was passed to prevent constitutional crises due to
presidential incapacity. The author expects you to believe that
following the Constitution would cause a constitutional crisis. If
Trump tried to pardon himself, as he has threatened to do, that would
create a constitutional crisis.
The fact is, at this point in time,
Mike Pence either believes that Trump is capable of doing his job, or
he is content to let a corrupt old fool sit in the Oval Office.
Republicans know that the Trump train is going to derail. But they
aren't going to turn on him before the midterm elections. If Trump
manages to find that upper limit of what the public will tolerate,
they are going to use Trump as a scapegoat. They're going to trade in
their MAGA hats and act like they were part of the #NeverTrump
resistance all along.
No comments:
Post a Comment